Under the rational basis standard, the court determines whether there is any rational justification for the classifications created by a challenged rule, which must further a "legitimate governmental interest". Strict scrutiny is at the opposite end of the spectrum for the rational basis test used. If the analysis discusses a compelling interest that is narrowly tailored to achieve its goals, it is a strict scrutiny analysis. The language of the court's opinion indicates the level of scrutiny applied.
Strict scrutiny is applied in cases where there is a real and appreciable impact on, or a significant interference with the exercise of a fundamental right. There must not be any less restrictive means that would accomplish the government?s objective just as well. Also, the means to achieve the purpose, objective, or interest is reviewed to determine if it is "narrowly tailored" to the accomplishment of the governmental purpose, objective, or interest. The purpose, objective, or interest being pursued by the government must be "compelling". The strict scrutiny standard is the most thorough analysis. It is a level of scrutiny applied to classifications that are alleged to violate constitutional rights to equal protection of the laws. They may determine whether an act by the President, Congress, a national, state, or local administrative official, a state legislature, a local governing board, or a lower court is valid. The level of scrutiny thats applied determines how a court will go about analyzing a law and its effects. The rational basis test is also referred to as "rational review." Further Readingįor more on the rational basis test, see this University of Virginia Law Review article, this New York University Law Review article, and this University of Notre Dame Law Review article.Strict scrutiny is one level of analysis used by the courts to determine the constitutionality of the actions of other governmental bodies. When the constitutionality of a law is challenged, both state and federal courts will commonly apply one of three levels of judicial scrutiny from the spectrum of scrutiny: Strict scrutiny. The rational basis test is generally used when in cases where no fundamental rights or suspect classifications are at issue.
The rational basis test is generally used when in cases where no fundamental rights or suspect classifications are at issue. The intermediate scrutiny test and the strict scrutiny test are considered more stringent than the rational basis test. The intermediate scrutiny test and the strict scrutiny test are considered more stringent than the rational basis test.
Affirmative action plans must be judged by the strict scrutiny standard that requires any race-conscious plan to be narrowly tailored. There are three judicial review tests: the rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the strict scrutiny test. Classifications of people on the basis of their race or ethnicity. To pass the rational basis test, the statute or ordinance must have a legitimate state interest, and there must be a rational connection between the statute's/ordinance's means and goals. A judicial review test is what courts use to determine the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance. The rational basis test is a judicial review test.